Yesterday my group and I had
to argue why the world should not have one world currency. We were opposition
and my members were; Mario, Radi and Jason. On the affirmative side we had;
Alisya, Laras, Aca and Albern. In my point of view our team had planned out how
the debate would go but since we all got a bit nervous it didn’t go like we had
planned. But overall my team and I were pretty organized. I was the second speaker and my point
was that you would have to divide many tasks and that could lead to more
problems.
My team had four members and
one of them did the rebuttal. So we had to convince the audience with three
arguments. Our arguments were structured from the strongest to the weakest.
Which would make the audience listen to the first one to the last one. The
evidence and facts to support my assertion were taken from different websites.
And I think I could’ve put more facts since I only put like two. This would not
be enough to actually convince the audience to choose our team. It also depends
on what the human mind believes as a fact.
I believe that my team argued
the case well but we could’ve done better. Since some of us forgot words or
even paragraphs. There should be done more practicing with the team. I think we
pointed out our argument very well and detailed. I think we could practice more
so we would not skip anything we were supposed to say. And we would not fall
over our words. And for the preparation of the debate, I think we used more
time for researching than actually practicing the debate itself and our
arguments.
I think we made use of
Ethos/Pathos and Logos but not in a very strong way. I don’t think that we made
use of Pathos, since we didn’t do anything relative to that. Whenever doing a
debate Ethos is the strongest persuasive technique since you have to persuade
the audience. In my opinion the group that argued about the death penalty for
drug traffickers were very good. Both of them were good but in my opinion the
affirmative side used Ethos in a better way.
For an overall final grade out
of the three criteria I was being assessed on I think that I would’ve gotten a
16 out of the 21 points I could get.
No comments:
Post a Comment